The Most Fragile Men Control the Internet
They're designing a digital world where algorithms cater to male fragility instead of reality.
I’ve been watching the tech bro rebrand, Zuckerberg bulking up, Musk ranting about testosterone, billionaires cosplaying as cavemen, and I have to say the quiet part out loud: They look like clowns.
The men running the internet aren’t just controlling the narrative, they’re starring in their own all-male drag show, desperately performing masculinity for each other. Musk, Zuckerberg, and their billionaire boy band are so obsessed with proving who’s the most alpha that they’ve lost the plot. They’re not exuding strength; they’re just insecure men rigging platforms and rewriting algorithms like a group of closeted frat boys terrified of being the least manly guy in the room.
At this point, their version of masculinity isn’t just fragile, it’s camp.
Take Zuckerberg. He went on Joe Rogan’s podcast to whine about how the world needs more “masculine energy.” And what does his version of masculinity look like? A social media empire that encourages posts calling women "property" while banning information about their life-saving healthcare.
In a desperate, bootlicking move, Meta has blurred, blocked, and removed posts from abortion pill providers, even suspending their accounts and hiding them from search results, all while letting misogynists run wild. But this double standard isn’t about men being powerful and women living in fear; it’s about male insecurity being codified into policy. Zuckerberg isn’t masculine, he’s a boy cosplaying as a man. Real men protect women; they don’t make them more vulnerable to predators. Even by his own definition of masculinity, he doesn’t measure up.
These men claim to want to go back to when men were men, so let’s talk about their own masculine standards. Evolutionarily speaking, men have always played a role in ensuring the safety and survival of the group. The essence of masculinity, at its best, has always been about using strength and strategy for the benefit of the collective. In hunter-gatherer societies, men would work together to hunt large game, not just for their own benefit, but to provide food for the entire group, including women, children, and the elderly. Protection of the most vulnerable, particularly pregnant women, was paramount in early human societies. But let’s be honest, Zuckerberg wouldn’t last five minutes among the ultra-masculine cavemen he probably idolizes. They’d be embarrassed by his selfishness and shortsightedness, sabotaging his own species just to protect his fragile ego and win approval from other men.
And then there’s Elon Musk, a self-proclaimed alpha who literally rewired Twitter’s algorithm to artificially boost his own tweets, because nothing says strength like rigging the game so you don’t have to compete. Imagine being so fragile you have to buy and rig an entire platform to manufacture respect.
Imagine being so fragile you have to buy and rig an entire platform to manufacture respect.
Musk didn’t stop there. He made sure Trump got the same algorithmic coddling, boosting Trump’s content because nothing screams “masculine energy” like two insecure men holding hands while silencing women and critics. Not only did Musk reinstate Trump on the platform, but he also bent the rules to ensure his content got maximum exposure, proving that their version of strength relies entirely on manipulation, not merit. For a guy who declared “masculinity is back” he sure isn’t radiating much of it, unless your definition of masculinity is begging other men for approval.
Nothing screams “masculine energy” like two insecure men holding hands while silencing women and critics.
And just when you thought it couldn’t get more embarrassing, Musk poured his artificially inflated influence into a fake Super PAC that lied about Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s stance on reproductive rights, claiming she and Trump saw eye to eye, an insult to history so absurd it’s practically satire. Instead of using his power to protect and provide for women, Musk lied about one to make more of them vulnerable to predators, manipulating reality in a way that threatens women’s ability to survive, a failure so profound it goes against the most basic instincts of masculinity. Real men ensure the safety of their communities; Musk uses his power to make the world more dangerous for the people he should be protecting.
And for men who claim to hate DEI and champion “meritocracy,” they’ve created their own version: Loser DEI —A system for guys who can’t win without boosting their own voices, inflating their allies, and erasing their critics. They sneer at the idea of uplifting people who don’t deserve it, yet their entire playbook is built around rigging the system in their favor.
And their loser DEI worked. Congratulations to them on the promotions they could never have earned on their own! Musk’s tweets promoting election lies racked up over 1.2 billion views, tipping the scales for his favorite lapdog, Donald Trump, and handing him a position he’d never be qualified for on merit. Musk’s interference ensured his election-related posts garnered twice the views of all political ads on the platform combined during the election period.
For guys who love to brag about being self-made men, it’s almost poetic how much Trump and Elon’s so-called success depends on cheating. If they’re such powerful alphas, why does everything they touch hinge on manipulation? Imagine having a masculinity so fragile that you have to rig algorithms just to keep it up.
But here’s the real question, especially given the paternalistic way they view women: Are we weak, mindless objects, or are we so powerful that they have to build entire digital empires just to control us? Pick a lane, boys. You can’t claim women are irrelevant while dedicating your entire existence to silencing us. Or, to quote the late philosopher Regina George, “Why are you so obsessed with us?”
Imagine having a masculinity so fragile that you have to rig algorithms just to keep it up.
The truth they can’t admit? They’re terrified of us. Women represent everything they wish they could be, strong, smart, unstoppable. Their desperate attempts to silence us and limit our sovereignty aren’t about protecting masculinity; they’re about masking their fear of women.
But misogyny has a fatal flaw: It thrives in silence, and silence isn’t something women are known for. Women have always found ways to fight back. Abortion providers are already building underground networks. Communities are organizing. For every account banned, women find new ways to keep their voices alive.
You can try to erase us, but you can’t stop us. Every attempt to control us only proves how much power we hold.
Trump, Zuckerberg, and Musk want to believe they’re kings of a new digital era, but their actions reveal the truth: They’re scared little boys, rewriting the rules so they don’t have to face a world where they’ve already lost.
Let them play their algorithmic games. Let them rig the system to cater to their egos. We’re not going anywhere, and they know it.
I absolutely agree:
"Real men protect women; they don’t make them more vulnerable to predators."
I also believe that women are equally capable of and should take care of themselves. In short, people should, equal opportunity, look out for their own welfare.
I, as a married man, try to ensure that, in the event anything happens to me, my wife has the keys to my kingdom. Going on 40 years in, that's perfectly ok with me. Newlyweds, you'll have to work that out. I'd like her to do the same for me. But, I don't expect her to or hold it against her if she doesn't.
I'm a firm believer in "You do you.". People have a right to be themselves without apology or permission, within the bounds of law, reasonably. What I do with that is on me and vice versa.
I don't want my wife thinking she HAS to rely on me. I tell her, time and again, there's almost no reason that anything I can do, she can't. Something, anything may happen to me, any day, any time.
I'm also a firm believer in empowerment. Bridge the gaps. Raising the bridge is a valid alternative to lowering the river. Think outside the box. Learn something new. Acknowledge (I did not say "accept" - that's on you) your shortcomings / limits / barriers. Find your comfort zone. Admit mistakes. It's ok to be wrong. Be gracious and forgiving of yourself and others. 2nd and 3rd chances. Or, why stop there?
They created the world they feared instead of evolving into a brighter future